12 minute read

Introduction
As Donald Trump begins his second term, his administration has already signalled a renewed focus on reshaping Middle Eastern geopolitics. From escalating tensions with Iran to expanding the Abraham Accords, his policies are set to impact global security, commerce, and energy markets profoundly.
Did you know? Approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, a region where escalating tensions could disrupt global markets overnight.
This article explores the impacts of Trump’s policies on U.S.-Iran relations, the Abraham Accords, energy security, and non-state threats. It also provides actionable insights for professionals navigating this complex landscape.
Key Takeaways
U.S.-Iran Relations: Increased sanctions or military actions could further destabilise the region and disrupt global supply chains.
Abraham Accords Expansion: Strengthening Israel-Arab ties may unlock economic opportunities but raise security risks.
Strait of Hormuz: Already a flashpoint, this critical chokepoint may see heightened tensions, with significant implications for energy markets.
Non-State Threats: Reduced U.S. military engagement could embolden extremist groups and proxy forces, exacerbating regional instability.
1. Revisiting Trump's Middle East Policies
Trump’s first administration reshaped U.S. policy in the region with far-reaching impacts:
The Abraham Accords: These agreements normalised relations between Israel and several Arab nations, creating new alliances and economic opportunities. However, they sidelined the Palestinian cause, fuelling unrest.
Iran Strategy: Trump’s withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and implementation of maximum economic pressure on Tehran heightened tensions, pushing Iran to expand its nuclear programme and proxy activities.
Reduced U.S. Military Presence: Troop withdrawals from Iraq and Syria created power vacuums exploited by regional actors like Iran, Russia, and Turkey.
As Trump’s second administration begins, these policies are likely to intensify, reinforcing alliances while deepening divisions.
2. U.S.-Iran Relations: A Tipping Point
Iran remains a central focus of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Trump’s continuation of his “maximum pressure” campaign could further escalate tensions.
Recent Developments
Over the weekend, the Trump administration announced a fresh wave of sanctions targeting Iran’s oil exports and banking operations, aiming to cripple the economy further and curtail its nuclear ambitions.
Reports indicate that the U.S. is considering increased naval deployments in the Persian Gulf to counter potential Iranian threats.
Potential Developments
Sanctions and Isolation: Tougher sanctions may cripple Iran’s economy, heightening domestic unrest and fuelling anti-U.S. sentiment.
Military Escalation: The administration’s hard-line stance could lead to military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, prompting retaliation through proxy forces.
Proxy Conflicts: Iran-backed militias in Iraq, Yemen, and Syria may intensify attacks against U.S. interests and allies.
3. Strait of Hormuz: A Strategic Lifeline
The Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for global oil flows, has long been a focal point of tensions. Approximately 20% of the world’s oil passes through the strait, and its strategic location near Iran gives Tehran significant leverage.
Recent Trends
Heightened surveillance and joint naval drills by U.S. and allied forces aim to safeguard commercial shipping routes.
Iran has frequently threatened to close the strait during periods of heightened conflict, while attacks on commercial vessels highlight its vulnerability.
Risk Implications
Energy Markets: Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz would trigger significant oil price volatility, affecting global markets.
Insurance Premiums: Political and maritime insurance costs for businesses operating in the Gulf would likely rise.
Supply Chain Stability: Prolonged instability in the strait could delay shipments and complicate logistics for companies dependent on the region.
Actionable Advice
Collaborate with maritime security firms to safeguard shipping operations.
Explore advanced maritime tracking technologies and analytics to anticipate and mitigate potential disruptions in real time.
4. Abraham Accords: Strengthening Alliances and Heightened Risks
The Abraham Accords remain a cornerstone of Trump’s Middle East strategy. His administration aims to expand these agreements, potentially bringing Saudi Arabia into the fold.
Opportunities
Economic Growth: Enhanced trade and collaboration between Israel and Arab states could drive investments in technology, defence, and infrastructure.
Geopolitical Realignments: Stronger ties between Israel and Arab states counterbalance Iranian influence in the region.
Risks
Palestinian Discontent: Neglecting the Palestinian issue could fuel unrest, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank.
Increased Targeting: The perception of an anti-Iran bloc may lead to asymmetric attacks on Gulf states or Israeli facilities.
Actionable Insights
Monitor developments in Saudi-Israeli negotiations to identify emerging investment opportunities.
Recognise that while the Abraham Accords open doors for collaboration, navigating the political sensitivities and regulatory environments in these emerging markets remains a challenge for businesses.
5. Energy Security: Navigating Market Volatility
Middle Eastern oil producers, led by OPEC+, face mounting pressure to balance global energy demands with geopolitical challenges.
Recent Updates
OPEC+ announced production adjustments to stabilise oil prices amidst fluctuating demand and geopolitical uncertainties.
Corporate Considerations
Plan for Volatility: Decision-makers across sectors should incorporate energy price fluctuations into their planning and hedging strategies.
Review Insurance Policies: Insurers and corporate leaders must ensure policies include robust protection for energy and political risks.
6. Non-State Actors: A Persistent Threat
Non-state actors, including terrorist organisations and militias, continue to exploit power vacuums across the region. Groups like ISIS and Hezbollah remain active, posing significant threats to security and stability.
Mitigation Strategies
Strengthen cybersecurity protocols to protect against attacks targeting supply chains and financial systems.
Engage with local and international security partners to mitigate physical threats to personnel and assets.
Strategic Recommendations for Professionals
To navigate the complexities of Trump’s second term, professionals should adopt comprehensive strategies:
Conduct Comprehensive Risk Assessments: Evaluate political and security risks across key Middle Eastern markets.
Diversify Supply Chains: Reduce reliance on vulnerable routes like the Strait of Hormuz to mitigate disruption risks.
Leverage Regional Expertise: Engage local specialists to navigate regulatory, cultural, and geopolitical complexities.
Prepare Contingency Plans: Develop flexible strategies for dealing with scenarios such as energy market disruptions or geopolitical escalations.
Conclusion: Managing a High-Stakes Environment
As Donald Trump begins his second term, his administration’s policies are set to deepen divisions and reshape alliances in the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz, already a hotspot, could see heightened tensions, underscoring the need for strategic planning and foresight.
Partner with Custodia Intelligent Resources
At Custodia Intelligent Resources, we specialise in providing tailored solutions for navigating global risks. From scenario planning and risk assessments to operational strategies, we help organisations across industries remain resilient in uncertain times.
Visit www.custodia.co.uk to learn how we can support your business in mitigating risks and capitalising on emerging opportunities.
Disclaimer
This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Readers should consult with qualified experts or professionals regarding their specific needs or circumstances. Custodia Intelligent Resources disclaims any liability for decisions made based on the content of this article.
Comments